I don't particularly get why you would assume "Gio was lying or exaggerating to Bambosh about what Andrew/Miles as a proxy were threatening" over "Miles/Andrew were threatening legal action to an extent that lead to Bambosh washing their hands of the whole thing," aside from preconceived bias. We're lacking screenshots of that happening because they were conversations Bambosh had under NDA, and whatever happened in them led to that statement.

One is conjecture, the other has screenshots and Miles statements backing it up, as well as Bambosh, Gio and Miles stating lawyers were involved.

I'm sorry to jump so hard on that particular statement, but ita eerily reminscent of language I've seen people use about whatever the heck went down with the WP office fiasco... the employees Bambosh wasn't mistreated, an unknown employee Gio convinced them they were and no one else is at fault!