@bigchalupa @cami

fair enough! to be clear unlike some others i think what happened to the website was simple negligence, nothing but big ups and shouts out to anyone who is finally putting rubber to the road on it. i was surprised because from my perspective, the work has been essentially done at least twice by what i would assume to be even smaller teams who also were doing it in their spare time! not trying to imply that there's anything untoward going on, which to be fair may be surprising from the tone of my other posts. just a genuine technical curiosity that is probably outside the scope of this thread. some sort of devblog from the people involved in fixing it that goes into how badly the infrastructure was broken and what goes into a full rebuild vs. just mirroring the pre-viz site (and why the former is preferable, which i figure is probably the case but couldn't tell you why) would be really interesting.