Addendum to my previous super long reply: The entire article was hard for me to read. The reply talked about why it was so hard to read. If I missed some things, just talk about it. Hussie treated these people really shitty and handled the situation super poorly and too aggressively. I think in hindsight I can understand calling them an abuser for abusing their legal power, so I take back what I said regarding calling them one, but I don't think Hussie abuses literally everyone that works for them? Everything else I said about the article just being generally poorly written is stuff I still stand by though.