@dilettanteCinephiliac

>which in my personal opinion would make it much easier to doctor and/or omit information and brings into question the legitimacy of everything said
Yes, correct. But Gio's seems like the person to keep receipts, so I'm sure he also has screenshots (and Miles can easily disprove anything he said, too - but did not (yet?)).

>Still stand by what i said about you calling Miles cringe for writing without capital letters though, this is a homestuck forum for crying out loud it's not like you're needing to figure out a particularly complicated fantroll typing quirk or something.
I agree on you in principle. But I suppose that I really think abuse took place, it was Andrew's fault and it should be Andrew's responsability to do something about it (or defuse the situation/prove Gio's wrong), and it rubs me the wrong way that Miles is here on damage control - and personally I find that if Gio is right in his assertions, then Miles (and Andrew!!!) is ALSO acting in a cringe way. I don't think it is a crime to think something is cringe.

>As well as, as stated above, Gio's statements about one of the writers of Vast Error have been blatantly proven false.
Yes, but that was conjecture and not fact. I'd rather them disprove the facts on the article and the main issue at hand.